Friday, August 26, 2011

The Web 2.0 classroom

 To answer what a Web 2.0 classroom looks, I must first describe what it does not look like. It doesn’t look like the traditional independent desks aligned in rows with the chalkboard and teacher’s desk in front. Nor does it look like a computer lab with rows of giant CRT monitors obstructing the view from other students. Web 2.0 is accessible, participatory, and social. The classroom does not necessarily have to have walls or “brick and mortal.” The classroom could be the quiet spaces where the students escape, however with Internet access. Physical classrooms could be rearranged in circular “clouds” to facilitate sharing of ideas with their classmates. Students would use smaller form factor laptops that take up less space and are portable. Students would be encouraged to move and share their ideas with other “clouds” in the class as well as other classrooms, schools, and nations. Teachers would be cross-trained in technology and would have the confidence to be technological leaders in the classroom. Instead of posting reports and drawing in the hallways of schools, work would be posted on the Web to share with other students. Work could be organized according to topic and grade. There would be a shared, multi-cultural learning experience. Students could see how others interpreted the same project from different perspectives in different regions of the U.S. and abroad.

Creating a technology-rich constructivist classroom requires money first and foremost. It requires training and, if applied globally, it would require removing non-conforming teachers. Lawsuits and a host of teacher union problems would ensue with that route. The simplest method would be starting the classrooms one at a time with federal, state, and district administrators supporting individual teachers incorporating Web 2.0 technology in the classroom. Web safety nets would have to be in place as well as a campaign to educate parents on Web 2.0 technology, benefits, dangers, and was to mitigate those dangers. Supporting research and documentation should be provided to parents. Also to help educate parents, schools could offer free classes on Web 2.0 technology. Teachers could be required to have profiles on LinkedIn, hiring could require access to the profile and resume instead of posting resume’s in the traditional HR website.

There are no easy answers for the Web 2.0 classroom, but I believe it must begin with administrators giving freedom to the teachers and teachers taking the next step with the freedom. And of course, money.

4 comments:

  1. I agree with you that Web 2.0 tools should be implemented one classroom at a time. Doing so would be much more effective than blanket implementation. Funds could be used to equip classrooms for teachers that are willing to integrate the new technology into their curricula. What usually happens is schools or districts spend millions of dollars to outfit every classroom with expensive technology which never gets fully utilized because some teachers refuse to use the technology or not enough funds are available to properly train teachers to get the most out of the new technology.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My honest opinion is that the newer generation of teacher are a night and day difference compared to the teachers of the past, this is why slowly but surely technology will take the classroom by storm and it wont be stopped either your on board or your not. Nice job man.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great job, I like your approach on how you described web 2.0 by showing what it's not. Unfortunately, we need money in order to have a rich technology. I hope government would support more this field.

    ReplyDelete